I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
毕竟，勤俭持家，一直被视为中国女性的传统美德。，推荐阅读新收录的资料获取更多信息
，推荐阅读新收录的资料获取更多信息
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP)，详情可参考新收录的资料
7self.types = typechecker.finalise();